tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33342813.post7293019863225539562..comments2023-07-24T23:47:13.083-04:00Comments on The PA-IN-Erudition: Bob G.http://www.blogger.com/profile/09222203353717749897noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33342813.post-2527400161143726662017-05-25T20:17:11.745-04:002017-05-25T20:17:11.745-04:00Chris:
Wow...I got a "two-fer" from '...Chris:<br />Wow...I got a "two-fer" from 'ya. I think that's a FIRST!<br />---I figured that blue "bag" was for your lunch...no harm done...lol.<br />---I said crime WAS spreading, and by the looks of things, into areas that are not only NOT USED to it, but are having to prepare for it out of necessity.<br />---HA! You got that Armani deal...funny, huh?<br /><br />---6oo ACRES??? God, that's a LOT of park space (why not raze most of the SE to get some of that?<br />---4800 ACRES??? Yikes, better raze ALL the rental houses in the ENTIRE SOUTH SIDE now.<br />(see a pattern to rid us of the mooks yet?)<br />---That 10 min walk thing made no sense to me, given our current population.<br />---So that $102 isn't enough...are we in for ANOTHER "rate hike" for that additional $9 bucks?<br />---You're NOT including the hoop across our street there, right? Our lawns are the ad hoc "bark parks" around here.<br />---That's like our city...NEVER define or quantify what needs it...just get Council to reach a bit deeper into OUR pockets for more moolah.<br /><br />That was an impressive list of stats. Made more sense that Al and his skewing babbling.<br /><br />Thanks for stopping by and commenting.<br />(very informative)<br /><br />Stay safe (and drying out along the trails) up there, brother.Bob G.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09222203353717749897noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33342813.post-51135477988279829522017-05-25T19:50:00.844-04:002017-05-25T19:50:00.844-04:00All right, here I am with the stat breakdown. By ...All right, here I am with the stat breakdown. By the categories they used, just to get FTW to the HALFWAY point, we need:<br /><br />To add 600 acres to existing parks to get their median park size metric;<br /><br />To add 4,852 acres overall to hit their % of the city metric (because a perfect score is 20% plus);<br /><br />To get another 46,887 people to within a ten-minute walk to a park (we ONLY have 108,582 that close); and this was a double-weighted category;<br /><br />To spend another $2,435,689 (per year, I assume), or $9.87 per person, to hit their spending metric;<br /><br />To add 27 basketball hoops (yes, THAT was worth 1/6 of the total), 7 1/2 bark parks, and 12 playgrounds;<br /><br />And add 5 senior/recreational centers, a nebulous metric that was only less obscure than the number of "four key amenities" that they never bothered to define or quantify.CWMartinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06798867734074134647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33342813.post-68653580931933720262017-05-25T19:22:57.861-04:002017-05-25T19:22:57.861-04:00I have a blue bag, does that count? (For my LUNCH...I have a blue bag, does that count? (For my LUNCH! God that sounded bad...)<br /><br /><br />The Bike: Yeah, some parent that learned to do that crap from his parent... and prolly thinks their the smartest thing on four wheels. Your surprise is coming...<br /><br /><br />This park survey has me interested. I'm doing some stat study and I'll send you my results when done. <br /><br />Btw- that's a lot of money for a potato sack, lol@!CWMartinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06798867734074134647noreply@blogger.com